wondering if this "collaboration" is just more work for you

Wondering If This “Collaboration” Is Just More Work For You

Can We Talk About This for a Second?

You’re sitting in a weekly team meeting, minding your own business and slowly sipping your morning coffee, when a colleague looks over at you with a bright, inspired smile and says those magical words. What if we collaborated on this slide deck? It’s a beautiful word, isn’t it? Collaboration. It sounds so cooperative and balanced, like a perfectly synchronized rowing team gliding effortlessly across a calm lake. In that brief, shining moment, your mind paints a wonderful picture. You imagine the two of you sitting side by side, tossing ideas back and forth like friendly beach balls, dividing the tasks with mathematical precision, and finishing the whole project two days early. It feels like the professional equivalent of a warm hug. So, you smile back, nod your head, and say that you’d love to collaborate. Then, the actual work begins.

The Disappearing Act

Somehow, this always happens. Within forty eight hours, the beautiful rowing team metaphor starts to feel a little different. You find yourself sitting at your desk at seven in the evening, staring at a shared document that you’ve spent the last three hours building from scratch. Your partner has contributed exactly one sentence, a single bullet point that is currently highlighted in bright yellow with a note that says, is this the right font? That’s the moment the realization hits you. For some reason, this collaboration has slowly transformed into your own private assignment, with the added bonus of having to explain every single decision to another person who’s currently offline.

Nobody ever talks about how normal this has become, but we’ve all been there. It starts with the language we use in the workplace. The word we is doing an enormous amount of work in these situations. When your partner says, we should probably pull the data from last quarter, what they actually mean is, you should pull the data, format it into a spreadsheet, and then explain it to me in a way that makes sense. But because they used the word we, it feels like a joint effort. It’s a linguistic trick that we willingly fall for every single time because we want to be helpful team players. We convince ourselves that sharing the credit means we must also share the load, even when the division of labor looks like a steep hill where one person is doing all the climbing.

The Scheduling Dance

Then comes the scheduling portion of the collaboration. You suggest three different times to meet and talk about the project. They reply to your email two days later, apologizing because their calendar is just so crazy right now, but they suggest that you go ahead and start drafting the outline so they can look at it when they get a chance. So you draft the outline. You send it over, feeling like you’re making great progress. Five minutes later, they send back a quick message saying, looks awesome, keep going. We all know how this ends. At some point, it stops being about the project and starts being about the funny logic we use to keep ourselves going. You tell yourself that this is actually better because you get to control the direction of the work. You convince yourself that doing ninety percent of the work is actually a shortcut because explaining how to do it would take twice as long as just doing it yourself. For some reason, this suddenly feels completely reasonable in the moment. We tell ourselves these little stories because the alternative is admitting that we’ve accidentally signed up for a group project where we’re the only active member.

The Final Polish

And then, of course, there’s the final review. This is when your partner suddenly finds their second wind. After days of quiet silence, they log into the shared document and begin making very specific, aesthetic changes. They change a few words to synonyms that mean the exact same thing. They suggest moving a picture slightly to the left. They add a concluding slide that says, thank you, in a slightly larger font. It’s their contribution, and in their mind, they’ve just delivered the finishing touch that brings the whole project together. When the presentation finally happens, they speak with absolute confidence. They use words like our approach and how we tackled this challenge. You stand next to them, nodding and smiling, quietly wondering if anyone else in the room can tell that your partner’s seeing seventy five percent of these slides for the very first time. But here’s the real secret. We don’t stay mad about it. We don’t bring it up to management, and we don’t refuse to work with them again. Because deep down, we know that collaboration works best when the work is actually shared, but we also know that people are just wonderfully messy. Sometimes we’re the ones doing the bulk of the labor, and sometimes, if we’re being completely honest with ourselves, we’re the ones who show up at the very end to suggest a slightly different shade of blue. So the next time someone suggests a joint project, you’ll probably say yes again. You’ll smile, you’ll nod, and you’ll convince yourself that it’ll be different. And honestly, we all do this. You’ll probably do it again next week, and that’s completely fine. Just make sure you’re the one who gets to pick the font.

Author

  • Elias Navarro Career Work Life Columnist

    Elias Navarro writes about the emotional side of work: the quiet resentment behind “I’m fine,” the identity crisis after a role change, and the way people internalize performance reviews as verdicts on their worth. His work explores how workplace cultures reward over-functioning, how burnout sneaks up on high-achievers, and how long someone will stay in a misaligned job because it feels safer than being unknown. He’s interested in the subtle trade-offs people make between security, ambition, and self-respect.